Skip to main content

X, Malcolm



X is the surname that Malcolm gave himself when he shed his old self in order to be a dignified human being. The Autobiography of Malcolm X is the story of that conversion and what happened eventually.

Malcolm Little was an African American born in 1925 in Nebraska. His father, a Baptist preacher, was killed by the Ku Klux Klan and his mother was sent unjustly to a mental hospital when he was still a boy. Malcolm grew up in a detention home till eighth grade after which he moved to Boston to live with a foster family. Discrimination and ridicule from the white majority drive him out of school to the streets of Boston where he learns more evil things than good such as gambling, drinking, and doing drugs. He becomes a go-between for black pimps and their white clients and begins to date Sophia, a white woman older than him. He abandons his girlfriend Laura for the sake of Sophia and Laura is driven to prostitution.

He tries many jobs such as washing dishes on a train and selling sandwiches before taking up a waiter’s job in a Harlem bar. This bar job puts him in touch with the underworld for which Harlem was famous. He soon became a hustler and a drug addict. It didn’t take long for him to be arrested for a burglary, something that he had been doing frequently with the help of Sophia and others. The autobiography says that his arrest was more because of his association with a white woman than the burglary cases.

The Massachusetts state prison provided opportunities for Malcolm’s intellectual and spiritual growth. He was kept in solitary confinement because of his fierce temper and the depression caused by drug withdrawal which had earned him the nickname of Satan. A black prisoner called Bimbi becomes his counsellor. Malcolm begins to make use of the prison library and soon takes interest in the organisation called Nation of Islam and its spiritual leader Elijah Muhammad.

Nation of Islam taught its followers that the blacks were the first humans on earth and they lived in peace under Allah’s care. Then some mad scientist unleashed the evil race of white men who imposed their wicked ways on everyone. The ancient Pharaohs who built the pyramids and Aesop the fabulist were all black men. Soon Malcolm X rose as a powerful orator and debater in the prison commanding much respect.

In 1952 when he was released on parole, he met Elijah and became a preacher of Nation of Islam. He changed his surname to X, the indeterminate letter which was to represent his original but lost African family name. Elijah appointed him a minister at the Detroit temple. Eventually he married Betty.

Malcolm became famous as a preacher and was invited to speak even by universities. Elijah was not quite pleased with this popularity. Soon allegations began to emerge that Malcolm was trying to take over Nation of Islam. In the meanwhile, Elijah’s popularity was facing significant threat from two paternity suits filed by his secretaries. Elijah was said to have had many children with his secretaries apart from those with his own wife.

Malcolm’s comments on John F Kennedy following his assassination became an excuse for Elijah to impose a 90-day silence on him. Nation of Islam also issued death threats on Malcolm. He left for Florida accepting the invitation of Cassius Clay, the world-famous boxing champion. Clay had already developed Islamic leanings and soon he declared his Muslim affiliation and took the name Muhammad Ali.

His relationships with Elijah having gone sour, Malcolm abandoned Nation of Islam and founded Muslim Mosque, Inc. He went on Haj to Mecca which gave him the title of El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz and he used that title in all his subsequent communications though he continued to be known in America as Malcolm X.

The autobiography ends there. All autobiographies are lies, as Bernard Shaw said. The lies are not meant to be lies, however. Autobiographies are written in order to give shape to lives which are otherwise chaotic. An autobiography presents a person not as he is but as how he wants to be seen by the world. Moreover, human memory is not a highly reliable source of information. The present changes the past inevitably because we reinterpret the past to soothe our present. We accommodate the pains of the past into the joys of the present so that they become more bearable.

Betty Shabazz, Malcolm’s wife, was not quite happy with her married life. She complained frequently about her dissatisfaction with their sexual life. Malcolm was a misogynist and a neglectful husband. We don’t see all these in the autobiography, however. Malcolm got Betty pregnant repeatedly just to keep her home, away from her potential extramarital affairs. We don’t see that either in the autobiography.

Nevertheless, the autobiography is good. We shouldn’t expect autobiographies to be ruthlessly honest especially when written by someone like Malcolm who was trying to soothe his personal wounds with the palliative of words. The book does provide a lot of insights into human life and nature. For instance, it shows us how certain events in life leave deep scars in our psyches so much so that even God (Allah or whatever you call that) can’t heal certain behavioural impacts of those wounds. The painful childhood and youth of Malcolm gave him certain basic rules of life which not even Allah could change later. They were the hustler’s street rules: (1) Be suspicious of everyone; (2) Know your enemy; and (3) Your public image is everything.

Even when Malcolm taught Islam as America’s ultimate panacea, the religion failed to erase the hustler’s street rules from his psyche. That’s how life is. That’s one of the many things we learn from this autobiography.

For those who are interested, my memoir, Autumn Shadows, is available at Amazon as eBook. Click here for a copy.

PS. This is part of a series being written for the #BlogchatterA2Z Challenge. The previous parts are:
14. No Exit
17Quixote
18. The Rebel

Comments

  1. Autobiography allows the author to say his side of story and to justify his actions. Malcom X was an interesting character. In spite of his shortcomings, his role against racial discrimination cannot be denied.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Autobiographies are usually written for therapeutic purposes. Hence the apparent touch of fiction. Those familiar with autobiography will understand that.

      Delete
  2. I had no idea about Malcolm X and his autobiography. But I agree with what Shaw says that they are all lies. I feel that the facts are always twisted to show the person in question in the most positive way blurring the lines between facts and fiction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But, but, Sonia, is there anything called absolute truth in human life? Life is not math and science where absolutes rule. Life is about perspectives.

      Delete
  3. A celebrated figure who had his own arguments for all that he preached, however controversial they might have been.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, had he been born in better circumstances he would have conquered greater peaks. That is fate.

      Delete
  4. Had heard of him. Now now more thanks to you :)
    Interesting street rules. One has to be street smart for sure.
    "All autobiographies are lies" - small wonder, important facts are kept out... We never know the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All truth will never be known in human life anyway. Do we even know ourselves fully?

      Delete
  5. We interpret our pasts to suit our present, that is so true. That is how we make peace with ourselves. I hadn't thought of autobiographies as a means to soothe one's wounds. Having started your book, I understand it now. And didn't know about Malcolm, thanks for sharing his story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm delighted to have you as a reader of my memoir. Certain readers add value to a book.

      Delete
  6. I just had heard this name .Came to know about him today only . I never even thought that autobiographies are lies

    ReplyDelete
  7. This book is so on my TBR list. Thank you for a wonderful introduction and insight to the book.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This was quite an interesting read. Came to know a lot about Malcolm X.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Autobiographies are all lies...Now this will stay with me for a while. In that case I think what we are for the world is a lie only. Because even when we don't write autobiographies what we live to "show" to the world is a perfect picture of us. I'm kind of confused by this. On the other hand there are always two sides of the same coin. One that we see and another that is seen by the world. So which side is the truth?
    On another note, thank you for this. I had heard of Malcolm X but not in so much detail. Another chapter added.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aren't we liars even if we don't write autobiographies? Isn't there some pretension in what we do most of the time? What is truth other than what we project?

      I'm an autobiographer myself. 😃

      Delete
  10. The one biopic, a recent one, that came to my mind was that of the movie "Sanju, a biopic". As rightly mentioned the biopics are lies that try to white wash the deeds of the past by working on the fragile and short lived public memory. Malcom X appears to me a person of many layers and thus intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shaw didn't literally mean the lie thing, Anagha. It's a metaphor for the protean nature of truth. Can the entire truth be known about any person even by the person himself? Most people are intriguing. Malcolm had slightly more unique experiences and hence his life captures our interest. He is not lying, he is curing himself by writing his autobiography.

      Delete
  11. Malcolm X was a real inspiration for many. Hope to read his autobiography some day.
    Noor Anand Chawla

    ReplyDelete
  12. Never knew about imposing a 90-day silence on him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Religions always know how to impose silence on the faithful.

      Delete
  13. Had heard of him but didn't know about his autobiography....will try to read it some day. But yes, autobiographies only portray a picture that the person would like to see himself as... That's very true!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. This goes straight up my reading list. Thanks for the suggestion.
    Happy A2Zing :)
    -- rightpurchasing.com

    ReplyDelete
  15. Though I was aware of his assassination but wasn't aware of his life story! This made for a very interesting read. Will check out Malcolm X's autobiography!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Some insight into what men do for power.All the while preaching and exploiting people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aren't religions just tools for wielding power over people? My post today is on Harari's book 'Sapiens' which looks at this theme in a little more detail.

      Delete
  17. I only had faint ideas of who he was before I watched the 1992 Spike Lee biography. Denzel Washington had a great role there, and the story I guess was largely taken up from X's autobiography.

    Excellent summary of the book. Kudos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess the autobiography must have played a big role in the movie script, but I don't know.

      Thanks for the kudos.

      Delete
  18. About Betty, is it written in his autobiography? Till now, I never gave much thought to 'autobiography' just read the book. This book sounds to give insight about life a lot more. The hustler’s street rules: (1) Be suspicious of everyone; (2) Know your enemy; and (3) Your public image is everything... I've heard about these rules and seen it in movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those details about Betty are mentioned in a biography written by someone else.

      Delete
  19. I have downloaded the book of yours. Congratulations. I will read it once I complete this challenge as I am way behind the schedule.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Delighted to hear you'll be reading my book. A2Z is getting over anyway.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...