Skip to main content

Naïve Realism

 


“The offence of sedition cannot be invoked to minister to the wounded vanity of the governments,” declared the judge who granted bail to 22-year-old Disha Ravi recently. Disha was arrested on charges of sedition. She was supposedly working with Greta Thunberg to undermine the Indian government! The only thing that she did which provoked the government was to support the enduring farmers’ agitation.

Disha is just one among hundreds of people being victimised in India merely because they have wounded the vanity of the government. The vanity of the present Indian government comes from what psychology and philosophy call naïve realism.

Naïve realism is the belief that one’s view of events is unbiased and correct and when others disagree they must be wrong. Naïve realists assume that those who disagree with them are uninformed, irrational and biased. A whole lot of politicians in the ruling party in India now seem to be naïve realists with vanities wounded by the ghosts of history.

“Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sedition charges have been deployed as a clear tool of intimidation,” The Washington Post wrote while discussing Disha Ravi’s bail. The Post added that “96 percent of sedition cases filed against 405 Indians for criticizing politicians and government officials were registered after 2014, when Modi assumed power.”

The naïve realists of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party have degraded Indian democracy to such an extent that the latest Freedom House democracy report listed India as a “partly free” country. Indians are not free in Modi’s regime, not even free to express opinions, let alone eat what you like or wear the dress of your choice. The BJP has a simple worldview in which India is the greatest country, Indian pantheon has the only true gods, and Narendra Modi is the saviour of the country and its gods. Anyone who questions that is a traitor. As simple as that. As naïve as that.

We know – or should know – that reality is never so simple as to bestow all truths to any one individual however long and white his beard may be growing. Reality is an intricate complexity. Mysteries inside enigmas, if one may borrow Churchill’s analogy. Anyone who approaches reality with the notion that his own view is the only right view is fit to be in a lunatic asylum though he may be sitting in the king’s throne. For all sane people, perception must be marked by two qualities: openness and awareness.

The moment you blindly believe certain scriptures written centuries ago as the foundation of all truths, you have closed your mind to living truths. How can any awareness enter into a mind that is closed once and for all to new realities, new possibilities, inevitable changes?

Writing about naïve realism decades ago, Bertrand Russell observed, “We think that grass is green, that stones are hard, and that snow is cold. But physics assures us that the greenness of grass, the hardness of stones, and the coldness of snow are not the greenness of grass, the hardness of stones, and the coldness of snow that we know in our own experience, but something very different.”

Reality is not what we think it is, in simple words. Reality is not just what we perceive. Truth is multi-dimensional. If you insist on looking through a peephole at a minute fraction of a colossal entity and claim that what you see is the only and entire truth… well, you need to check your vanity for the number of wounds on it. At least.

PS. This is powered by #BlogchatterA2Z

Previous post in this series: Murderer

Tomorrow: Outliers

Comments

  1. Naïve realism is the sad reality of today's government. You correctly pointed out the facts.
    Deepika Sharma

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People choose to be dumb sometimes. We live in one such historic times.

      Delete
  2. Yes, being a naive person myself I whole heartedly supported BJP in 2014. But within two years I was totally disillusioned and completely vexed when they started reconverting people through Ghar Wapsi and started telling people whom to marry and also banned Beef. India is in for troubled times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mentioned a few of the evils - the tip of the iceberg.

      Delete
  3. You have hit the nail right on its head. The ruling party and its leaders won't change but we can avoid Naive Realism in our own thought processes and dealing with the other ones. And we should.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A very good post mirroring the reality of the times!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a poignant portrayal of the draconian era that Indian democracy is facing currently. Your article puts facts as facts and makes one think of the grave times ahead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are faced with dark days in many ways. The pandemic is an additional burden.

      Delete
  6. I read your post first thing in the morning and it reads like a wake up call. When the power of social media is employed to perpetuate naive realism, it becomes harder to resist its lure.
    That is why posts like this one should be written and read.
    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you endorse my way of looking at reality and writing about it. Most writers today prefer expediency or siding with those in power.

      Delete
  7. Naive realism wasn't this prominent until a few years ago, although it has existed across ages. With the current situation of the pandemic in the country, naive realism has reached alarming heights. Not just with the government but even with their blind followers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. Thinking people are being victimized today like in medieval Europe. We are so obsessed with the past that we have really reached there!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...

Bharata: The Ascetic King

Bharata is disillusioned yet again. His brother, Rama the ideal man, Maryada Purushottam , is making yet another grotesque demand. Sita Devi has to prove her purity now, years after the Agni Pariksha she arranged for herself long ago in Lanka itself. Now, when she has been living for years far away from Rama with her two sons Luva and Kusha in the paternal care of no less a saint than Valmiki himself! What has happened to Rama? Bharata sits on the bank of the Sarayu with tears welling up in his eyes. Give me an answer, Sarayu, he said. Sarayu accepted Bharata’s tears too. She was used to absorbing tears. How many times has Rama come and sat upon this very same bank and wept too? Life is sorrow, Sarayu muttered to Bharata. Even if you are royal descendants of divinity itself. Rama had brought the children Luva and Kusha to Ayodhya on the day of the Ashvamedha Yagna which he was conducting in order to reaffirm his sovereignty and legitimacy over his kingdom. He didn’t know they w...

Liberated

Fiction - parable Vijay was familiar enough with soil and the stones it turns up to realise that he had struck something rare.   It was a tiny stone, a pitch black speck not larger than the tip of his little finger. It turned up from the intestine of the earth while Vijay was digging a pit for the biogas plant. Anand, the scientist from the village, got the stone analysed in his lab and assured, “It is a rare object.   A compound of carbonic acid and magnesium.” Anand and his fellow scientists believed that it must be a fragment of a meteoroid that hit the earth millions of years ago.   “Very rare indeed,” concluded the scientist. Now, it’s plain commonsense that something that’s very rare indeed must be very valuable too. All the more so if it came from the heavens. So Vijay got the village goldsmith to set it on a gold ring.   Vijay wore the ring proudly on his ring finger. Nobody, in the village, however bothered to pay any homage to Vijay’s...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...