Skip to main content

Spirituality

 


“Man does not live by bread alone,” Jesus said. “He needs butter too,” the wit added. But even with butter on it, bread will not satisfy the human being for long. His soul hankers after something, something that is not quite of this world. That hankering is what makes the human beings spiritual.

It is difficult to speak about the soul or the spirit because science has not been able to identify that part of the human being. The soul is not the mind. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts especially when we come to living organisms and all the more so in the case of human beings. Man is not just the body and the mind put together. There is something more to the person than the body-mind sum. That ‘more’ is the soul or the spirit.

It is the soul that makes a person a spiritual being. It is the soul that makes us feel that we are incomplete somehow and consequently puts us on a quest for completion. That quest for completion is what spirituality is essentially about.

To complete ourselves, we need something from out there. Some people find that something in God, some in religion, many in art and literature, quite a few in unique personal commitments.

It is a common misunderstanding that one needs religion in order to be spiritual. One of the most spiritual characters in fiction is arguably Dr Bernard Rieux in Camus’s novel, The Plague.  

Dr Rieux does not believe in religion and God. When the plague breaks out in Oran and people start deserting the quarantined city, Dr Rieux chooses to stay back and fight the plague with all his talent and strength. He does not see himself as a hero. He sees it as his duty to combat disease and restore health. He is a “true healer” in the words of a philosophical chronicler in the novel. He knows that disease is one of the evils that plague mankind and it should be combatted. All evils should be combatted. The internalisation of that superior consciousness is man’s real spirituality.

Spirituality is not about suffering for a god, not dying or killing for a god. Spirituality is not uttering prayers in temples or churches. It is not even going on pilgrimages or donating to charity. Prayers, pilgrimages and charity may help one to become spiritual. But spirituality is not those things. Spirituality is a realisation of our oneness with the cosmic reality whose evils we should mitigate as best as we can. The spiritual person knows that the evils of the reality out there are part of himself because he is a part of that reality. The same goes for goodness too. And so it become the duty of any spiritual person to increase the goodness and reduce the evil in the world around him.

Man-made entities like religion, nation/nationalism, race, class (socialism’s working class, for example), and political party can never lead one to genuine spirituality because the moment you make any of these entities absolute you are on the way to totalitarian domination by some people over other people.

Spirituality has nothing to do with domination or subordination. Spirituality is about liberation. It liberates you from the clutches of narrow considerations that divide creatures into we-and-them or high-and-low or whatever. Spirituality enables you to perceive the sanctity where it does exist. Spirituality enables you to enhance that sanctity, to make the world a better place.  

PS. This is powered by #BlogchatterA2Z

Previous post in this series: Rebel


 

Comments

  1. Often people don't understand the difference between spirituality and religion

    ReplyDelete
  2. A spiritual person would not kill. A religious person would in the name of his religion...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Religion is no guarantee for the soul's emancipation. It can, on the contrary, bring out the devil with.

      Delete
  3. Wonderful post. Each and every point you make is robust and (in my mind, at least) true.
    Thank you.
    Love this: "The spiritual person knows that the evils of the reality out there are part of himself because he is a part of that reality."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Great to have readers who catch what the writer is saying.

      Delete
  4. Your points are all correct. Confusing spirituality with religion is grave fault. Somehow your post today calmed my troubled mind. Thank you for writing this
    Deepika Sharma

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Spirituality is not about suffering for a god, not dying or killing for a god. Spirituality is not uttering prayers in temples or churches. It is not even going on pilgrimages or donating to charity. Prayers, pilgrimages and charity may help one to become spiritual. But spirituality is not those things. Spirituality is a realisation of our oneness with the cosmic reality whose evils we should mitigate as best as we can. "

    So true... Wish everyone could understand this concept.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Consciousness level should rise to understand this.

      Delete
  6. Spirituality liberates you from the clutches of narrow considerations that divide creatures into we-and-them or high-and-low or whatever. You said it. And that's why we find a majority of (so-called) religious persons as devoid of spirituality in the real sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If all religious people were spiritual, this world would be a Paradise.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

Indian Knowledge Systems

Shashi Tharoor wrote a massive book back in 2018 to explore the paradoxes that constitute the man called Narendra Modi. Paradoxes dominate present Indian politics. One of them is what’s called the Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS). What constitute the paradox here are two parallel realities: one genuinely valuable, and the other deeply regressive. The contributions of Aryabhata and Brahmagupta to mathematics, Panini to linguistics, Vedanta to philosophy, and Ayurveda to medicine are genuine traditions that may deserve due attention. But there’s a hijacked version of IKS which is a hilariously, if not villainously, political project. Much of what is now packaged as IKS in government documents, school curricula, and propaganda includes mythological claims treated as historical facts, pseudoscience (e.g., Ravana’s Pushpaka Vimana as a real aircraft or Ganesha’s trunk as a product of plastic surgery), astrology replacing astronomy, ritualism replacing reasoning, attempts to invent the r...

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Review I read this book purely by chance. R K Narayan is not a writer whom I would choose for any reason whatever. He is too simple, simplistic. I was at school on Saturday last and I suddenly found myself without anything to do though I was on duty. Some duties are like that: like a traffic policeman’s duty on a road without any traffic! So I went up to the school library and picked up a book which looked clean. It happened to be Waiting for the Mahatma by R K Narayan. A small book of 200 pages which I almost finished reading on the same day. The novel was originally published in 1955, written probably as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi and India’s struggle for independence. The edition that I read is a later reprint by Penguin Classics. Twenty-year-old Sriram is the protagonist though Gandhi towers above everybody else in the novel just as he did in India of the independence-struggle years. Sriram who lives with his grandmother inherits significant wealth when he turns 20. Hi...

Ghost with a Cat

It was about midnight when Kuriako stopped his car near the roadside eatery known as thattukada in Kerala. He still had another 27 kilometres to go, according to Google Map. Since Google Map had taken him to nowhere lands many a time, Kuriako didn’t commit himself much to that technology. He would rather rely on wayside shopkeepers. Moreover, he needed a cup of lemon tea. ‘How far is Anakkad from here?’ Kuriako asked the tea-vendor. Anakkad is where his friend Varghese lived. The two friends would be meeting after many years now. Both had taken voluntary retirement five years ago from their tedious and rather absurd clerical jobs in a government industry and hadn’t met each other ever since. Varghese abandoned all connection with human civilisation, which he viewed as savagery of the most brutal sort, and went to live in a forest with only the hill tribe people in the neighbourhood. The tribal folk didn’t bother him at all; they had their own occupations. Varghese bought a plot ...