Skip to main content

Why is BJP terrorist?




Today’s Malayala Manorama reports that the Madhya Pradesh government paid five hundred rupees each to thousands of people who were brought from the 33 districts of the state to swell the rally held in Amarkhand where PM Modi exercised his rhetorical skills yet another time.  The report goes on to say that the money was taken from the Sachch Bharat funds.

BJP is using enormous sums of money for propaganda of all sorts some of which are extremely heinous and remind us of the propaganda techniques employed by Hitler and the methods employed by Mossad.  Now if the Prime Minister will say things he did a few months ago (like: 80% of gau rakshaks are criminals, or ‘kill me instead of attacking the Dalits’), we know it’s only a temporary ploy for placating the current mood. 

The Prime Minister along with his Goebbelsian Amit Shah has a clear vision and goal: to make India a Hindu Rashtra.  Eliminating the minority communities and Dalits is part of the game.  The latest rules about animal protection have really nothing to do with animals but are devious strategies for making the minority people and Dalits buckle under pressure.

This is what makes BJP a terrorist party.  While the Islamic terrorists use bombs, their BJP counterparts use the state machinery to eliminate people.

Comments

  1. The surprising situation is that a large chunk of Hindus prefer being labeled as terrorist to safeguard their religious rights and practice the same way as jihadist feel pride to get included in terrorism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very true. People become just like their enemies in the zeal for vanquishing them. That has happened in India now.

      Delete
  2. These people seem tightening things day by day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's one of the strategies for eliminating the enemies. Deprive your enemies of what they eat and their traditions: what worse thing can anyone do to the enemies?

      Delete
  3. I beg to differ Sir when you assert that the clear vision and goal of the Indian prime minister is to make India a Hindu Raashtra. It may be the goal of the BJP or the Raashtriya Swayamsevak Sangha or the Vishwa Hindu Parishad or the Hindu Mahasabha or the like wise but definitely not the present Indian premier. He is a very complicated person and his vision is not that straight to be understood by common people. He has nothing to do with the concept of Hindu Raashtra or the Hindutva philosophy or protecting the Hindus (and the Hinduism) or making India a great nation or making the BJP a great party or taking care of the Dalits and the poor or the like wise. He doesn't bother at all not only for his derelict wife but also for his mother and other family members. Be it Mohan Bhagawat or L.K. Adavani or A.B. Vajpeyee, none is more than a used item for him now. For him Gandhi, Patel and Ambedkar are also just instruments to further his political interests. His sole aim to rule India like a dictator for the lengthiest period possible with all his whims and fancies and enjoy the luxury of treating people and issues like pawns on the chessboard of his politics. His biggest strength is his strong belief that none can fool him but he can fool anybody and that too for a substantially long period of time. Ironically, his staunch supporters and blind devotees are not able to realize that he is fooling none else but them only.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have added a substantial argument here, Jitendra, and I'm happy you did. I have always suspected Modi to be a mere Narcissist and nothing more. His sartorial sense, his bombastic eloquence with its hollow slogans, his eagerness to project himself abroad, the dictatorial approach to everything, eliminating enemies ruthlessly... all these indicate his narcissism. I'm grateful to you for pointing it out.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl

The Ugly Duckling

Source: Acting Company A. A. Milne’s one-act play, The Ugly Duckling , acquired a classical status because of the hearty humour used to present a profound theme. The King and the Queen are worried because their daughter Camilla is too ugly to get a suitor. In spite of all the devious strategies employed by the King and his Chancellor, the princess remained unmarried. Camilla was blessed with a unique beauty by her two godmothers but no one could see any beauty in her physical appearance. She has an exquisitely beautiful character. What use is character? The King asks. The play is an answer to that question. Character plays the most crucial role in our moral science books and traditional rhetoric, religious scriptures and homilies. When it comes to practical life, we look for other things such as wealth, social rank, physical looks, and so on. As the King says in this play, “If a girl is beautiful, it is easy to assume that she has, tucked away inside her, an equally beauti...

Helpless Gods

Illustration by Gemini Six decades ago, Kerala’s beloved poet Vayalar Ramavarma sang about gods that don’t open their eyes, don’t know joy or sorrow, but are mere clay idols. The movie that carried the song was a hit in Kerala in the late 1960s. I was only seven when the movie was released. The impact of the song, like many others composed by the same poet, sank into me a little later as I grew up. Our gods are quite useless; they are little more than narcissists who demand fresh and fragrant flowers only to fling them when they wither. Six decades after Kerala’s poet questioned the potency of gods, the Chief Justice of India had a shoe flung at him by a lawyer for the same thing: questioning the worth of gods. The lawyer was demanding the replacement of a damaged idol of god Vishnu and the Chief Justice wondered why gods couldn’t take care of themselves since they are omnipotent. The lawyer flung his shoe at the Chief Justice to prove his devotion to a god. From Vayalar of 196...

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...

Our gods must have died laughing

A friend forwarded a video clip this morning. It is an extract from a speech that celebrated Malayalam movie actor Sreenivasan delivered years ago. In the year 1984, Sreenivasan decided to marry the woman he was in love with. But his career in movies had just started and so he hadn’t made much money. Knowing his financial condition, another actor, Innocent, gave him Rs 400. Innocent wasn’t doing well either in the profession. “Alice’s bangle,” Innocent said. He had pawned or sold his wife’s bangle to get that amount for his friend. Then Sreenivasan went to Mammootty, who eventually became Malayalam’s superstar, to request for help. Mammootty gave him Rs 2000. Citing the goodness of the two men, Sreenivasan said that the wedding necklace ( mangalsutra ) he put ceremoniously around the neck of his Hindu wife was funded by a Christian (Innocent) and a Muslim (Mammootty). “What does religion matter?” Sreenivasan asks in the video. “You either refuse to believe in any or believe in a...