Skip to main content

Why is BJP terrorist?




Today’s Malayala Manorama reports that the Madhya Pradesh government paid five hundred rupees each to thousands of people who were brought from the 33 districts of the state to swell the rally held in Amarkhand where PM Modi exercised his rhetorical skills yet another time.  The report goes on to say that the money was taken from the Sachch Bharat funds.

BJP is using enormous sums of money for propaganda of all sorts some of which are extremely heinous and remind us of the propaganda techniques employed by Hitler and the methods employed by Mossad.  Now if the Prime Minister will say things he did a few months ago (like: 80% of gau rakshaks are criminals, or ‘kill me instead of attacking the Dalits’), we know it’s only a temporary ploy for placating the current mood. 

The Prime Minister along with his Goebbelsian Amit Shah has a clear vision and goal: to make India a Hindu Rashtra.  Eliminating the minority communities and Dalits is part of the game.  The latest rules about animal protection have really nothing to do with animals but are devious strategies for making the minority people and Dalits buckle under pressure.

This is what makes BJP a terrorist party.  While the Islamic terrorists use bombs, their BJP counterparts use the state machinery to eliminate people.

Comments

  1. Pranju chakrapaniMay 28, 2017 at 9:15 AM

    The surprising situation is that a large chunk of Hindus prefer being labeled as terrorist to safeguard their religious rights and practice the same way as jihadist feel pride to get included in terrorism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMay 28, 2017 at 7:27 PM

      Very true. People become just like their enemies in the zeal for vanquishing them. That has happened in India now.

      Delete
  2. K V V S MURTHYMay 28, 2017 at 9:28 AM

    These people seem tightening things day by day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMay 28, 2017 at 7:28 PM

      That's one of the strategies for eliminating the enemies. Deprive your enemies of what they eat and their traditions: what worse thing can anyone do to the enemies?

      Delete
  3. जितेन्द्र माथुरMay 30, 2017 at 11:18 AM

    I beg to differ Sir when you assert that the clear vision and goal of the Indian prime minister is to make India a Hindu Raashtra. It may be the goal of the BJP or the Raashtriya Swayamsevak Sangha or the Vishwa Hindu Parishad or the Hindu Mahasabha or the like wise but definitely not the present Indian premier. He is a very complicated person and his vision is not that straight to be understood by common people. He has nothing to do with the concept of Hindu Raashtra or the Hindutva philosophy or protecting the Hindus (and the Hinduism) or making India a great nation or making the BJP a great party or taking care of the Dalits and the poor or the like wise. He doesn't bother at all not only for his derelict wife but also for his mother and other family members. Be it Mohan Bhagawat or L.K. Adavani or A.B. Vajpeyee, none is more than a used item for him now. For him Gandhi, Patel and Ambedkar are also just instruments to further his political interests. His sole aim to rule India like a dictator for the lengthiest period possible with all his whims and fancies and enjoy the luxury of treating people and issues like pawns on the chessboard of his politics. His biggest strength is his strong belief that none can fool him but he can fool anybody and that too for a substantially long period of time. Ironically, his staunch supporters and blind devotees are not able to realize that he is fooling none else but them only.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tomichan MatheikalMay 30, 2017 at 6:36 PM

      You have added a substantial argument here, Jitendra, and I'm happy you did. I have always suspected Modi to be a mere Narcissist and nothing more. His sartorial sense, his bombastic eloquence with its hollow slogans, his eagerness to project himself abroad, the dictatorial approach to everything, eliminating enemies ruthlessly... all these indicate his narcissism. I'm grateful to you for pointing it out.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Adventures of Toto as a comic strip

  'The Adventures of Toto' is an amusing story by Ruskin Bond. It is prescribed as a lesson in CBSE's English course for class 9. Maggie asked her students to do a project on some of the lessons and Femi George's work is what I would like to present here. Femi converted the story into a beautiful comic strip. Her work will speak for itself and let me present it below.  Femi George Student of Carmel Public School, Vazhakulam, Kerala Similar post: The Little Girl
47 comments
Read more

In this Wonderland

I didn’t write anything in the last few days. Nor did I feel any urge to write. I don’t know if this lack of interest to write is what’s called writer’s block. Or is it simple disenchantment with whatever is happening around me? We’re living in a time that offers much, too much, to writers. The whole world looks like a complex plot for a gigantic epic. The line between truth and fiction has disappeared. Mass murders have become no-news. Animals get more compassion than fellow human beings. Even their excreta are venerated! Folk tales are presented as scientific truths while scientific truths are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. When the young generation in Nepal set fire to their Parliament and Supreme Court buildings, they were making an unmistakable statement: that they are sick of their political leaders and their systems. Is there any country whose leaders don’t sicken their citizens? I’m just wondering. Maybe, there are good leaders still left in a few coun...
12 comments
Read more

Whose Rama?

Book Review Title: Whose Rama? [Malayalam] Author: T S Syamkumar Publisher: D C Books, Kerala Pages: 352 Rama may be an incarnation of God Vishnu, but is he as noble a man [ Maryada Purushottam ] as he is projected to be by certain sections of Hindus? This is the theme of Dr Syamkumar’s book, written in Malayalam. There is no English translation available yet. Rama is a creation of the Brahmins, asserts the author of this book. The Ramayana upholds the unjust caste system created by Brahmins for their own wellbeing. Everyone else exists for the sake of the Brahmin wellbeing. If the Kshatriyas are given the role of rulers, it is only because the Brahmins need such men to fight and die for them. Valmiki’s Rama too upheld that unjust system merely because that was his Kshatriya-dharma, allotted by the Brahmins. One of the many evils that Valmiki’s Rama perpetrates heartlessly is the killing of Shambuka, a boy who belonged to a low caste but chose to become an ascetic. The...
8 comments
Read more

The Little Girl

The Little Girl is a short story by Katherine Mansfield given in the class 9 English course of NCERT. Maggie gave an assignment to her students based on the story and one of her students, Athena Baby Sabu, presented a brilliant job. She converted the story into a delightful comic strip. Mansfield tells the story of Kezia who is the eponymous little girl. Kezia is scared of her father who wields a lot of control on the entire family. She is punished severely for an unwitting mistake which makes her even more scared of her father. Her grandmother is fond of her and is her emotional succour. The grandmother is away from home one day with Kezia's mother who is hospitalised. Kezia gets her usual nightmare and is terrified. There is no one at home to console her except her father from whom she does not expect any consolation. But the father rises to the occasion and lets the little girl sleep beside him that night. She rests her head on her father's chest and can feel his heart...
19 comments
Read more

The Real Enemies of India

People in general are inclined to pass the blame on to others whatever the fault.  For example, we Indians love to blame the British for their alleged ‘divide-and-rule’ policy.  Did the British really divide India into Hindus and Muslims or did the Indians do it themselves?  Was there any unified entity called India in the first place before the British unified it? Having raised those questions, I’m going to commit a further sacrilege of quoting a British journalist-cum-historian.  In his magnum opus, India: a History , John Keay says that the “stock accusations of a wider Machiavellian intent to ‘divide and rule’ and to ‘stir up Hindu-Muslim animosity’” levelled against the British Raj made little sense when the freedom struggle was going on in India because there really was no unified India until the British unified it politically.  Communal divisions existed in India despite the political unification.  In fact, they existed even before the Briti...
16 comments
Read more