Skip to main content

Dissenters’ Group

 

At Bhoothathankettu Dam - the kind of beauty that stands out

I am a member of a unique WhatsApp group of just 15 members. We were all companions for a couple of years or so in the latter half of the 1970s. Teenagers then, now we are all in the twilight of our lives: senior citizens. people with very strong views and convictions which are as diverse as women’s attires. There is an atheist and a Catholic priest in the group. There are NRI businessmen and simple village folk. There are Congies and Commies. There are devout religious believers and ruthless blasphemers. All the diversity possible in a group of 15 men (yeah, it’s an exclusively male bastion) can be found in this group. Most of these men are very articulate too. Views and opinions are expressed clearly and without any fear of being rebuffed or assaulted. You are respected for what you are. Of course, every member maintains respectability even when dissenting strongly.

This is a rare group because the kind of responsible freedom enjoyed by the members here is not seen in groups usually. I think a certain degree of enlightened acceptance of others and their otherness is required in order to coexist so blissfully. We had an informal gathering last year in a hotel in Kochi. Drinks, food, jokes, and laughter constituted the agenda. The spirit of camaraderie that bound together the boundless disparities of minds overwhelmed me. The WhatsApp group is very active to this day. There are scores of messages that flash in the group each day. And nobody fights about any of these though many of them are mutually contradictory, mutually annihilating.

Nobody imposes anything on anyone here. This is my view. Take it or leave it. You can question me and yet we remain friends. I respect you for what you are. You respect me for what I am. As Fritz Perls put it, “I am not in this world to live up to your expectations and you are not in this world to live up to mine. You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it’s beautiful.” It is that beauty which this group creates every day.

Is it possible to create that beauty in larger groups? I doubt. Enlightenment is very choosy about its receivers.  

Comments

  1. Sounds like the best group to be in, can I join.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, it's an exclusive group. Moreover you won't fit in, such is the structure of the group.

      Delete
  2. It is great to know that one such group exists that can agree to disagree without being disagreeable.... Something that is becoming a luxury in the times that we live in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This group has been in existence for over 2 years now. Doing exceptionally well too. Shows how we can be entirely different and yet be friends.

      Delete
  3. Power to your group! May these groups thrive and propagate!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Healthy friendships are possible notwithstanding individual differences. We've proved that.

      Delete
  4. Yes.. What you said is true... We are free as birds in the group... We fly and rest where ever we wish...... Speak what ever we feel. Let us keep it up

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 👍👍👍Ours is a rare group. Only geniuses create and manage to survive such diversity.

      Delete
  5. as diverse as women’s attires - loved this comparison. Great to know where there is such a diversity, yet acceptance is therefore all. Thank you for sharing with all of us. A motivation for all.
    As you said, is it possible in a large group? Well, can't say at this moment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it won't work in a large group. Here we are old friends who have no selfish motives within the group.

      Delete
  6. Such groups are very rare these days. I believe, agreeing to disagree is perhaps the first step towards forging a healthy, mature and strong bonding with another fellow human-being - one that emerges from an acceptance that views can, and often should, differ. Sadly however, these days opinions are becoming absolute and space for dialogue is shrinking drastically. Anywhere one looks, be it on social media or whatsapp groups or in the physical world, people expound their views and opinions but rarely listen to others'.
    Most of such fellows believe that to question is to be suspect! Dissent is equated with disloyalty and anyone who disagrees or is opposed to their beliefs and opinions is an enemy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The sociopolitical system determines people's behaviour to a large extent. We now have a system that polarises people into extremes: you are either with me or against me - no alternatives! You are either a supporter of the govt or antinational. Unfortunately visionless leaders end up doing this to their people.

      Delete
  7. You are so lucky to find such a group. Hope the world would emulate your group, but as you implied at the end, not likely possible. People just don't get it that we will continue having different perspectives. That doesn't mean that we are enemies. In fact, however much anyone tries, we all will never have exact same viewpoint, even if they shut us in a room for years, and teach us the same lessons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I too consider myself lucky to be a part of this group. The youthful spirit of camaraderie is what holds the members together. Such a spirit is not easy to maintain in late adult life but we have managed it somehow.

      Delete
  8. Its really excellent to know about such a group.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ayodhya: Kingdom of Sorrows

T he Sarayu carried more tears than water. Ayodhya was a sad kingdom. Dasaratha was a good king. He upheld dharma – justice and morality – as best as he could. The citizens were apparently happy. Then, one day, it all changed. One person is enough to change the destiny of a whole kingdom. Who was that one person? Some say it was Kaikeyi, one of the three official wives of Dasaratha. Some others say it was Manthara, Kaikeyi’s chief maid. Manthara was a hunchback. She was the caretaker of Kaikeyi right from the latter’s childhood; foster mother, so to say, because Kaikeyi had no mother. The absence of maternal influence can distort a girl child’s personality. With a foster mother like Manthara, the distortion can be really bad. Manthara was cunning, selfish, and morally ambiguous. A severe physical deformity can make one worse than all that. Manthara was as devious and manipulative as a woman could be in a men’s world. Add to that all the jealousy and ambition that insecure peo...

Abdullah’s Religion

O Abdulla Renowned Malayalam movie actor Mohanlal recently offered special prayers for Mammootty, another equally renowned actor of Kerala. The ritual was performed at Sabarimala temple, one of the supreme Hindu pilgrimage centres in Kerala. No one in Kerala found anything wrong in Mohanlal, a Hindu, praying for Mammootty, a Muslim, to a Hindu deity. Malayalis were concerned about Mammootty’s wellbeing and were relieved to know that the actor wasn’t suffering from anything as serious as it appeared. Except O Abdulla. Who is this Abdulla? I had never heard of him until he created an unsavoury controversy about a Hindu praying for a Muslim. This man’s Facebook profile describes him as: “Former Professor Islahiaya, Media Critic, Ex-Interpreter of Indian Ambassador, Founder Member MADHYAMAM.” He has 108K followers on FB. As I was reading Malayalam weekly this morning, I came to know that this Abdulla is a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind Kerala , a fundamentalist organisation. ...

Lucifer and some reflections

Let me start with a disclaimer: this is not a review of the Malayalam movie, Lucifer . These are some thoughts that came to my mind as I watched the movie today. However, just to give an idea about the movie: it’s a good entertainer with an engaging plot, Bollywood style settings, superman type violence in which the hero decimates the villains with pomp and show, and a spicy dance that is neatly tucked into the terribly orgasmic climax of the plot. The theme is highly relevant and that is what engaged me more. The role of certain mafia gangs in political governance is a theme that deserves to be examined in a good movie. In the movie, the mafia-politician nexus is busted and, like in our great myths, virtue triumphs over vice. Such a triumph is an artistic requirement. Real life, however, follows the principle of entropy: chaos flourishes with vengeance. Lucifer is the real winner in real life. The title of the movie as well as a final dialogue from the eponymous hero sugg...

Empuraan and Ramayana

Maggie and I will be watching the Malayalam movie Empuraan tomorrow. The tickets are booked. The movie has created a lot of controversy in Kerala and the director has decided to impose no less than 17 censors on it himself. I want to watch it before the jingoistic scissors find its way to the movie. It is surprising that the people of Kerala took such exception to this movie when the same people had no problem with the utterly malicious and mendacious movie The Kerala Story (2023). [My post on that movie, which I didn’t watch, is here .] Empuraan is based partly on the Gujarat riots of 2002. The riots were real and the BJP’s role in it (Mr Modi’s, in fact) is well-known. So, Empuraan isn’t giving the audience any falsehood as The Kerala Story did. Moreover, The Kerala Story maligned the people of Kerala while Empuraan is about something that happened in the faraway Gujarat quite long ago. Why are the people of Kerala then upset with Empuraan ? Because it tells the truth, M...

Empuraan – Review

Revenge is an ancient theme in human narratives. Give a moral rationale for the revenge and make the antagonist look monstrously evil, then you have the material for a good work of art. Add to that some spices from contemporary politics and the recipe is quite right for a hit movie. This is what you get in the Malayalam movie, Empuraan , which is running full houses now despite the trenchant opposition to it from the emergent Hindutva forces in the state. First of all, I fail to understand why so much brouhaha was hollered by the Hindutvans [let me coin that word for sheer convenience] who managed to get some 3 minutes censored from the 3-hour movie. The movie doesn’t make any explicit mention of any of the existing Hindutva political parties or other organisations. On the other hand, Allahu Akbar is shouted menacingly by Islamic terrorists, albeit towards the end. True, the movie begins with an implicit reference to what happened in Gujarat in 2002 after the Godhra train burnin...